Article ID: fe7525a434b868c4a7f57aabbba8f9bd09de1c4be9471bb0c31378b128e50d37
Source ID: regulatory:risk.net
Published At: -
Extraction Method: trafilatura
Body Text
This article was paid for by a contributing third party.More Information. Operationalising AI in capital markets risk infrastructures The panel - Alan Lee, Chief product officer, ActiveViam - Yury Korsky, Global head of model risk management, Vanguard - Aleksey Leksanov, Managing director and head of model risk management, Mizuho Group - Jason Tuo, Head of AI governance, Barclays - Moderator: Sakshi Sharma, Commercial editor, Risk.net Capital markets firms are pushing artificial intelligence beyond the pilot stage and into core risk and capital workflows, and the focus is shifting to what scalable deployment actually requires. Siloed architectures, data latency and limited explainability are the key challenges firms are working through, while the move from batch-based aggregation to intraday analytics is opening new possibilities for how infrastructure and governance are designed. This webinar examines how firms are embedding AI into workflows such as the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) capital calculation, profit-and-loss (P&L) explain, and intraday risk monitoring. Also under discussion is how firms are keeping outputs transparent and auditable for internal decision-making and regulatory reporting, and how existing model risk and governance frameworks are evolving as large language models (LLMs) become embedded in critical infrastructure. Key discussion points: - How capital markets firms are moving AI initiatives beyond the pilot stage, and the role data latency, siloed architectures and limited explainability play in preventing scalable deployment - How the shift from batch-based risk aggregation to intraday, decision-grade analytics is changing the infrastructure, data and governance requirements firms need to have in place - How firms are embedding AI into core risk and capital workflows such as FRTB capital calculation, P&L explain and intraday risk monitoring, and what a front-to-back integrated approach looks like in practice - How firms are ensuring that AI-driven outputs remain transparent and auditable for internal risk decision-making and regulatory reporting, and what meaningful explainability looks like when required to hold up under scrutiny - How are firms approaching governance and model risk controls as AI and LLMs become embedded in core risk infrastructures, and where are existing frameworks proving insufficient? Sponsored content Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy. If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved. You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5. If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Metadata (JSON)
{
"score": 7.416666666666667
}