Article ID: ec89f90d23578cc323fe19124a01e156dee2965bc1d24094571ece60cf9ff282
Source ID: secondary:businessinsurance.com
Published At: -
Extraction Method: bs4_heuristic
URL: https://www.businessinsurance.com/appeals-court-upholds-comp-exclusivity-in-fitness-club-assault/
Body Text
Appeals court upholds comp exclusivity in fitness club assault - Business Insurance Skip to content Register for free Search Search Log In Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Appeals court upholds comp exclusivity in fitness club assault by Louise Esola Workers Comp , Workers Comp Coverage Apr 16, 2026 A lawsuit brought by a fitness club referee who was assaulted during a basketball game was properly dismissed because his claims are barred by the exclusive remedy provisions of the state’s workers compensation law, a Minnesota appellate court ruled Monday. In Ayeni v. Life Time Group Holdings Inc. , the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled that injuries sustained by employee Philip Ayeni during a workplace altercation arose out of and in the course of employment, placing his injuries within the scope of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Act. Mr. Ayeni was officiating a basketball game at a Life Time fitness facility when three members, who had previously been suspended for violent behavior but later reinstated, attacked him after disputing a foul call, the ruling states. He suffered injuries, including a concussion and facial lacerations. Mr. Ayeni filed suit alleging assault, negligent supervision and related claims. The employer moved to dismiss, arguing that workers compensation provided the exclusive remedy. A lower court agreed, and the appellate court affirmed. On appeal, Mr. Ayeni argued that two exceptions to exclusivity should apply: the “assault exception,” which allows civil claims when an attack is motivated by personal reasons unrelated to employment, and the intentional-injury exception. The court rejected both arguments, finding the assault was directly tied to Mr. Ayeni’s job duties, noting the altercation stemmed from a foul call made during a game he was officiating. Because the incident was not “wholly unconnected” to his employment, the assault exception did not apply. The court also determined there was no evidence the employer acted with deliberate intent to cause injury – a high bar required to trigger the intentional-injury exception. Allegations that the company knew of prior member misconduct but failed to prevent the incident amounted to negligence, not intent, the court said. Related News Howden recruits former Acrisure transportation team April 16, 2026 U.K. targets wider NDA ban ahead of 2027 rollout April 16, 2026 India sets up $100M marine insurance pool April 16, 2026 Helvetia’s earnings grow 13% April 16, 2026 RiverStone’s profit rises to $295M April 16, 2026 More than 1M properties in England lack flood defenses April 16, 2026 Qatar’s insurers’ profits rise 16% April 16, 2026 HDI Global grows London energy presence April 16, 2026 Africa trade insurer seeks $500M capital raise April 16, 2026 Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in Business Insurance is a singular, authoritative news and information source for executives focused upon risk management, risk transfer and risk financing. Never miss important news: Become a Business Insurance Online subscriber today Subscribe Now Information About Us Contact Advertise Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Copyright 2026. BUSINESS INSURANCE HOLDINGS Member, Beacon International Group, Ltd.
Metadata (JSON)
{
"score": 12.8
}