Article ID: e108536c1548d59ba02f20e8b8a75bd6778af4f3d731202aa2b559f1940704fc
Source ID: secondary:businessinsurance.com
Published At: -
Extraction Method: bs4_heuristic
URL: https://www.businessinsurance.com/texas-appeals-court-upholds-4-5-million-sawmill-injury-verdict/
Body Text
Texas appeals court upholds $4.5 million sawmill injury verdict - Business Insurance Skip to content Register for free Search Search Log In Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Texas appeals court upholds $4.5 million sawmill injury verdict by Louise Esola Workers Comp Coverage , Workplace Safety Mar 19, 2026 A Texas appellate court upheld a $4.5 million jury award to a worker injured in a sawmill accident, rejecting arguments that the claim was barred by workers compensation exclusivity. In Antonio Munoz Aserradero LLC v. Thomas , the Court of Appeals for the 12th District of Texas on March 11 found sufficient evidence that the injured worker may not have been an employee at the time of the incident, allowing his negligence claims to proceed. The case stems from a May 2022 accident at a sawmill in Rusk, Texas, owned by Antonio Munoz Aserradero LLC. Jerry Thomas had arrived at the worksite after initially missing his planned start date and was told he would receive training before any employment decision was made, according to his testimony. After being shown how to operate a slab edger, Mr. Thomas resumed work following a lunch break and was injured within minutes when the machine caught his arm near a moving chain mechanism. Although the sawmill’s workers compensation insurer, Texas Mutual Insurance Co., paid medical expenses and indemnity benefits, Mr. Thomas filed a negligence suit, asserting he was not an employee but an independent contractor or invitee. A jury returned a 10-2 verdict awarding $4.5 million in damages, assigning 40% responsibility each to the sawmill and the company, and 20% to Mr. Thomas. On appeal, the defendants argued the trial court should have directed a verdict in their favor based on the exclusive remedy doctrine. The appellate court disagreed, citing conflicting evidence over whether Mr. Thomas had begun employment. The court also upheld the exclusion of evidence that Mr. Thomas received workers compensation benefits, noting such evidence is generally barred under the collateral source rule because it may be more prejudicial than probative. Similarly, the court found no abuse of discretion in excluding testimony suggesting Mr. Thomas had used marijuana on the day of the accident, concluding the evidence was either undisclosed, irrelevant or too remote. The appellate panel further held there was sufficient evidence that Mr. Munoz exercised control over the premises to support individual liability and rejected claims of jury instruction error. The ruling affirms the trial court’s judgment in full. Related News Bill targets workplace monitoring, expands health, safety oversight March 19, 2026 Liberty Mutual names underwriting president of Global Risk Solutions March 19, 2026 BMG signals Anthropic copyright fight won’t fade away March 19, 2026 China fuel export ban to hit Asia supply March 19, 2026 HDI Global to expand cyber insurance offerings in Japan March 19, 2026 Lloyd’s to set up operations in Indian financial hub March 19, 2026 QBE takes full control of Indian joint venture March 19, 2026 Report: Prolonged Middle East conflict could raise underwriting volatility March 19, 2026 Dutch shipowners face legal threat over war zones March 19, 2026 Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in Business Insurance is a singular, authoritative news and information source for executives focused upon risk management, risk transfer and risk financing. Never miss important news: Become a Business Insurance Online subscriber today Subscribe Now Information About Us Contact Advertise Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Copyright 2026. BUSINESS INSURANCE HOLDINGS Member, Beacon International Group, Ltd.
Metadata (JSON)
{
"score": 14.133333333333333
}