Court says widow must pursue line-of-duty benefits in trial court - Business Insurance

Article ID: e04d9537f3ef1e2f2193e746279efe43eeffa22bb24d762911ea8ff6e3366ae0

Source ID: secondary:businessinsurance.com

Published At: -

Extraction Method: bs4_heuristic

URL: https://www.businessinsurance.com/court-says-widow-must-pursue-line-of-duty-benefits-in-trial-court/

Body Text

Court says widow must pursue line-of-duty benefits in trial court - Business Insurance Skip to content Register for free Search Search Log In Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Court says widow must pursue line-of-duty benefits in trial court by Louise Esola Workers Comp Coverage , Workplace Safety Jul 17, 2026 The widow of a District of Columbia police sergeant must seek trial court review of the denial of enhanced line-of-duty survivor benefits, a divided appeals court ruled Thursday. In Eckenrode v. D.C. Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board , the District of Columbia Court of Appeals dismissed Alicia Eckenrode’s petition, holding that it lacked jurisdiction to directly review the retirement board’s decision. The ruling did not address whether the board correctly denied the benefits. Her husband, a Metropolitan Police Department sergeant, injured his knee on duty in 2006 and underwent a third knee surgery after it buckled at work in 2019. He was diagnosed shortly afterward with deep vein thrombosis and died in April 2020 from a pulmonary embolism caused by a blood clot. The board awarded Ms. Eckenrode a standard survivor annuity equal to 40% of the officer’s pay but denied enhanced benefits consisting of a $50,000 lump-sum payment and an annuity equal to his full pay. The board found insufficient evidence that his death was the “sole and direct result” of his work-related knee injury. The appeals court said applicants for enhanced survivor benefits are not constitutionally entitled to a trial-type hearing before the board. Because the proceeding was therefore not a “contested case,” Ms. Eckenrode must challenge the decision first in D.C. Superior Court, the majority held. A dissenting judge said the board should have conducted an evidentiary hearing allowing Ms. Eckenrode to question the medical evidence and cross-examine experts. Related News Judge won’t block Meta layoffs tied to AI bias suit July 17, 2026 Employer need not fund second opinion before comp claim is proven July 17, 2026 IMA takes two former Lockton brokers for its global practice July 17, 2026 Vantage names former Arch Capital leader David Gansberg CEO July 17, 2026 Utah high court overturns dismissal of comp claim over failed medical exams July 17, 2026 Liberty Mutual, Qwest end suit over Colorado fire July 17, 2026 Willis hires former Aon exec for life sciences role July 17, 2026 SiriusPoint names former Zurich exec COO July 17, 2026 Travelers posts higher earnings as most rates hold July 17, 2026 Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in Business Insurance is a singular, authoritative news and information source for executives focused upon risk management, risk transfer and risk financing. Never miss important news: Become a Business Insurance Online subscriber today Subscribe Now Information About Us Contact Advertise Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Copyright 2026. BUSINESS INSURANCE HOLDINGS Member, Beacon International Group, Ltd.

Metadata (JSON)

{
  "score": 12.366666666666667
}