Article ID: c7f272442976d16c89768a0864629d3cd543a0d50f12234cbaf10b2bb90b1105
Source ID: secondary:businessinsurance.com
Published At: -
Extraction Method: bs4_heuristic
URL: https://www.businessinsurance.com/maritime-law-bars-consortium-claim-by-seamans-wife/
Body Text
Maritime law bars consortium claim by seaman’s wife - Business Insurance Skip to content Register for free Search Search Log In Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Maritime law bars consortium claim by seaman’s wife by Louise Esola Claims Disputes , Workers Comp Coverage , Workplace Safety Aug 12, 2026 A California appeals court ruled Tuesday that the wife of a ferry worker injured on the job cannot recover loss-of-consortium damages under the Jones Act or general maritime law. In Simerley v. Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District , the California Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal of Lynette Simerley’s claim against the district, which employed her husband, Tracy Simerley, as a seaman on one of its ferryboats. The Simerleys sued the district in March 2025 after Mr. Simerley was injured while working aboard the vessel. Their lawsuit alleged negligence under the Jones Act, unseaworthiness and failure to provide maintenance, food and medical care. Ms. Simerley’s loss-of-consortium claim was based on allegations that the ferry, its equipment and its crew were unsafe and unseaworthy. The district argued that loss of consortium is a nonpecuniary form of damages unavailable under the Jones Act or general maritime law. A trial court sustained the district’s demurrer without allowing the Simerleys to amend the claim. The appeals court said the Jones Act, which allows seamen to sue their employers for negligence, limits recovery to pecuniary losses and does not authorize loss-of-consortium damages for nonfatal injuries. The court also rejected Ms. Simerley’s argument that the damages were independently available under general maritime law through the unseaworthiness claim. There was no clear historical pattern of courts awarding loss-of-consortium damages in personal injury cases involving unseaworthiness, the court said. Allowing the damages would also conflict with the Jones Act and the federal policy favoring uniform remedies for maritime injuries. The court said it would exceed the judiciary’s role to create a remedy that Congress did not provide under a parallel statutory claim. Related News Prison worker’s training injury comp claim, not constitutional seizure August 12, 2026 AI agent muscles into gym waitlist August 12, 2026 Business Insurance announces Women to Watch winners August 12, 2026 East Asian nations brace for historic typhoon season August 12, 2026 Insured cat losses hit six-year low: Swiss Re August 12, 2026 Extreme heat waves threaten businesses and infrastructure: Swiss Re August 12, 2026 Turkish insurers deliver as profits surge August 12, 2026 Typhoon threat disrupts hundreds of flights August 12, 2026 Canadian severe weather losses top $840M August 12, 2026 Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in Business Insurance is a singular, authoritative news and information source for executives focused upon risk management, risk transfer and risk financing. Never miss important news: Become a Business Insurance Online subscriber today Subscribe Now Information About Us Contact Advertise Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Copyright 2026. BUSINESS INSURANCE HOLDINGS Member, Beacon International Group, Ltd.
Metadata (JSON)
{
"score": 12.583333333333334
}