Jury orders Abbott to pay $53 million in preterm infant formula trial: Report - Business Insurance

Article ID: 88d388c54414d3aea4251114f9e0eac80a9bbd2d5aa85ed59077f747cee1be38

Source ID: secondary:businessinsurance.com

Published At: -

Extraction Method: bs4_heuristic

URL: https://www.businessinsurance.com/jury-orders-abbott-to-pay-53-million-in-preterm-infant-formula-trial-report/

Body Text

Jury orders Abbott to pay $53 million in preterm infant formula trial: Report - Business Insurance Skip to content Register for free Search Search Log In Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Jury orders Abbott to pay $53 million in preterm infant formula trial: Report General liability , Product Liability Apr 10, 2026 (Reute rs) – A jury in Chicago on Thursday said Abbott Laboratories must pay $53 million in compensatory damages to a group of families that had accused the company of failing to warn that its formula for premature infants can cause a potentially deadly bowel disease, according to the Chicago Tribune. The verdict came at the end of a lengthy trial in Cook County circuit court, the latest among hundreds of lawsuits alleging that Abbott’s cow’s milk-based formula products for preterm infants can cause necrotizing enterocolitis, or NEC. Four families’ lawsuits were consolidated for trial. The jury will meet again on Friday to determine how much Abbott must pay in punitive damages, according to the Tribune. A spokesperson for Abbott did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Abbott has denied that the products, which it says are essential for premature babies when their ​mothers cannot produce enough breast milk, cause NEC. NEC, which causes the death of bowel tissue, mostly affects premature newborns and has an estimated mortality rate of more than 20%. The children, who were born in Chicago-area hospitals between 2012 and ​2019, developed NEC but survived, according to their lawsuits. Three required surgery, and all live with ongoing health problems, according ⁠to the filings. Nearly 1,000 lawsuits have been filed against Abbott, which makes Similac formulas, and Enfamil manufacturer Mead Johnson, a unit of Reckitt. More than 700 of ​the cases are centralized in an Illinois federal court, with others pending in state courts in states including Illinois, Missouri and Pennsylvania. The products in question are cow’s milk-based formula and products for fortifying mothers’ milk that are specially made for infants in hospital settings, not ordinary formula available to consumers in stores. Illinois-based Abbott also makes medical devices, adult and child nutrition products and medicines. The companies have said that while ‌breast milk ⁠protects against NEC, their formulas do not cause it, and that the benefits of breast milk have long been known to clinicians. Abbott CEO Robert Ford suggested in 2024 that the preterm products might become unavailable because of the litigation. U.S. regulatory agencies and a working group of scientists convened by the National Institutes of Health said in a joint report in 2024 that current evidence supports the hypothesis that it is the absence of breast milk rather than exposure to formula that is associated with an increase in incidence of NEC. The ​companies have had a mixed record in ​the few cases to go ⁠to trial thus far. In 2024, a jury in St. Clair County, Illinois ordered Mead Johnson to pay $60 million to the mother of a premature baby who died after being fed the company’s Enfamil baby formula. A few months later, a ​St. Louis jury ordered Abbott to pay $495 million in damages in another case. Both verdicts have been appealed. The ​American Academy of Pediatrics ⁠filed a brief supporting Mead Johnson in its appeal of the verdict against it last year, saying that formula is part of the standard of care for premature babies. Abbott and Mead Johnson prevailed in one trial in Missouri state court in October 2024, but the judge in that case ordered a new trial after ⁠finding that ​lawyers for the defendants had acted improperly. That ruling is also on appeal. In March, a Florida state judge dismissed a NEC case slated for an upcoming trial after finding that an additional warning to the family’s doctors would not have changed their decision to use the formula. No cases have ​proceeded to trial in federal court, as the judge overseeing that litigation has dismissed three of the four cases selected for bellwether trials. In the most recent dismissal in October, the ​judge said that Abbott had presented substantial evidence on the need for the formula and shown the plaintiffs’ proposed alternative was unfeasible. Related News Broker M&A rise slightly in 2025: MarshBerry April 10, 2026 Battery maker fined $224,000, shut down after lead exposure violations April 10, 2026 SAIF names Ian Williams interim president, CEO April 10, 2026 Ceasefire fails to ease Europe’s jet fuel shortage April 10, 2026 Steadfast open to sale amid ongoing broker consolidation April 10, 2026 Zurich expands into Poland April 10, 2026 VIG Re posts $57M profit April 10, 2026 War risk rates unlikely to fall after ceasefire: WTW April 10, 2026 Perils sets windstorm industry loss at $560M April 10, 2026 Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in Business Insurance is a singular, authoritative news and information source for executives focused upon risk management, risk transfer and risk financing. Never miss important news: Become a Business Insurance Online subscriber today Subscribe Now Information About Us Contact Advertise Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Copyright 2026. BUSINESS INSURANCE HOLDINGS Member, Beacon International Group, Ltd.

Metadata (JSON)

{
  "score": 18.14
}