Article ID: 6acfd71b9bde879ec9adaaf76b9e3a3bc3320a5a11c0553a414c4c68b5e8bde2
Source ID: secondary:businessinsurance.com
Published At: -
Extraction Method: bs4_heuristic
Body Text
Uber ordered to pay $8.5 million in trial over driver sex assault claims - Business Insurance Skip to content Register for free Search Search Log In Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Uber ordered to pay $8.5 million in trial over driver sex assault claims Risk Management Feb 6, 2026 (Reuters) — A U.S. jury ordered Uber on Thursday to pay $8.5 million after finding it liable in a lawsuit brought by a woman who said she was sexually assaulted by a driver when she was 19, a verdict that could influence thousands of similar cases against the ride-hailing company. The case, brought by plaintiff JayLynn Dean, was the first trial – known as a bellwether – of more than 3,000 similar lawsuits against Uber that have been consolidated in U.S. federal court. Bellwether trials are used to test legal theories and help gauge the value of claims for possible settlements. The jury in federal court in Phoenix, Arizona, found that the driver was an agent of Uber, holding the company responsible for his actions. They awarded Ms. Dean $8.5 million in compensatory damages but declined to award punitive damages. Attorneys for Ms. Dean had sought more than $140 million in damages. Uber’s shares dipped 1.5% in after-hours trading. Shares of rival Lyft, which is facing lawsuits making similar claims, were down 1.8%. In a statement, an Uber spokesperson said the company would appeal and noted the jury rejected Ms. Dean’s other claims, that the company was negligent or that its safety systems were defective. “This verdict affirms that Uber acted responsibly and has invested meaningfully in rider safety,” the spokesperson said. Sarah London, an attorney for Ms. Dean, said the verdict “validates the thousands of survivors who have come forward at great personal risk to demand accountability against Uber for its focus on profit over passenger safety.” Ms. Dean, an Oklahoma resident, sued Uber in 2023, one month after her alleged assault in Arizona. She said Uber was aware of a wave of sexual assaults committed by its drivers, but had failed to take basic actions to improve the safety of its riders. Such assertions have long dogged the company, drawing headlines and congressional scrutiny. Alexandra Walsh, an attorney for Ms. Dean, said during the trial’s closing arguments that Uber had marketed itself as a safe option for women traveling at night, particularly if they had been drinking. “Women know it’s a dangerous world. We know about the risk of sexual assault,” Ms. Walsh said. “They made us believe that this was a place that was safe from that.” Uber says it’s not responsible for driver actions Uber, which has faced numerous safety controversies, including allegations of lax driver vetting and a culture critics said prioritized growth over passenger protection, has argued it should not be held liable for criminal conduct by drivers who use its platform, saying that its background checks and disclosures about assaults are sufficient. The company maintains that its drivers are independent contractors rather than employees, and that regardless of their classification it cannot be responsible for actions that fall outside the scope of what could reasonably be considered their duties. “He had no criminal history. None,” Kim Bueno, an attorney for Uber, said of the driver during closing arguments, noting that he had 10,000 trips on the app and a nearly perfect rating from riders. “Was this foreseeable to Uber? And the answer to that has to be no.” Ms. Dean’s lawsuit said she was intoxicated when she hired an Uber driver to take her from her boyfriend’s home to her hotel. The driver asked her harassing questions on the ride before stopping the car and raping her, Ms. Dean alleged in the lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, who normally sits on the bench in San Francisco, oversaw Ms. Dean’s case in Phoenix. Judge Breyer is managing all of the similar federal cases against Uber, which have been centralized in his court in San Francisco. The company is also facing more than 500 cases in California state court. In the only one of those cases to go to trial so far, a jury in September sided with Uber. The jury found that while the company had been negligent with its safety measures, that negligence was not a substantial factor in causing the woman’s harm. Morningstar analyst Mark Giarelli said while it was hard to extrapolate the larger financial implications, Uber’s background checks were likely to improve following the verdict. “This underscores the importance of robust background checks on convenience applications such as Uber, Lyft and DoorDash where there is interaction between customers and the supply side – drivers and delivery agents,” Mr. Giarelli said. Related News The BI Top 10 for the week of Feb. 2, 2026 February 6, 2026 Illinois bill ties business licensing to comp February 6, 2026 London insurance growth outpaces talent pipeline: LMG February 6, 2026 Police question CEO over massive data leak February 6, 2026 Legislation in Spain, Greece aims to rein in social media February 6, 2026 Zurich-Beazley deal could accelerate cyber consolidation February 6, 2026 Hannover Re’s net income hits $3.6B February 6, 2026 QBE upgrades directors and officers cover February 6, 2026 Germany’s insurance industry premiums grow 7% February 6, 2026 Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in Business Insurance is a singular, authoritative news and information source for executives focused upon risk management, risk transfer and risk financing. Never miss important news: Become a Business Insurance Online subscriber today Subscribe Now Information About Us Contact Advertise Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Copyright 2026. BUSINESS INSURANCE HOLDINGS Member, Beacon International Group, Ltd.
Metadata (JSON)
{
"score": 19.285
}