Article ID: 649036934696e642244fe970f125656581e2aa6590f79aeadc3db039d8a6c97f
Source ID: secondary:businessinsurance.com
Published At: -
Extraction Method: bs4_heuristic
Body Text
Texas court says farm liability law shields nonsubscriber ranch employer - Business Insurance Skip to content Register for free Search Search Log In Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Texas court says farm liability law shields nonsubscriber ranch employer by Louise Esola Claims Disputes , Workers Comp Coverage , Workplace Safety Jul 6, 2026 A Texas appeals court ruled Thursday that a ranch employer that did not carry workers compensation insurance was shielded from a wrongful death suit over a ranch hand killed by a hydraulic cattle chute because the accident fell under the state’s Farm Animal Liability Act. In Kinnibrugh v. Poteet , the Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, held as a matter of first impression that the law applies to risks inherent in farm animal activities and livestock handling even when an animal does not directly cause the injury. Richard Poteet, an experienced ranch hand who had worked for Randal and Beverly Kinnibrugh for 11 years, was vaccinating cattle with the couple’s son and employee, Kyle Kinnibrugh, when a cow went down in a hydraulic squeeze chute. Mr. Poteet yelled “let him up,” which the workers understood as a signal to release the chute so the cow could stand. Kyle Kinnibrugh released the chute without checking whether Mr. Poteet was clear, and Mr. Poteet was killed when his head was crushed by the chute’s side panels. Mr. Poteet’s widow sued the ranch owners, alleging negligence, gross negligence and vicarious liability. A trial court denied their bid for summary judgment, finding the statute did not apply because the death was not caused directly by an animal. The appeals court reversed, ruling that vaccinating cattle is expressly covered as a farm animal activity and that use of the hydraulic chute was directly related to that work. The court also rejected the widow’s argument that applying the law violated the Texas Constitution’s open courts provision. The opinion noted that the ranch owners were nonsubscribers to workers compensation insurance, but found the wrongful death claim was statutory rather than a protected common-law claim and that the Farm Animal Liability Act contains exceptions that can permit recovery in some circumstances. The court found no applicable exception, ruling that although the chute operation created an extreme risk, there was insufficient evidence that the defendants were subjectively aware Mr. Poteet was in danger when he gave the signal to release the chute. Related News Longbrook hires tax liability leader from AIG July 6, 2026 Soft reinsurance pricing to continue: JPMorgan July 6, 2026 Sanlam’s, Allianz’s Moroccan merger approved July 6, 2026 Casualty sidecars grow to 10% of market capacity: S&P July 6, 2026 Suncorp grows its cat reinsurance tower to $6.4B July 6, 2026 Acrisure U.K. boots key C-suite bosses July 6, 2026 Google to pay $144M over ad violations July 6, 2026 Indonesian insurers’ profits drop 25% July 6, 2026 Allianz Risk Transfer moves headquarters to Switzerland July 6, 2026 Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in Business Insurance is a singular, authoritative news and information source for executives focused upon risk management, risk transfer and risk financing. Never miss important news: Become a Business Insurance Online subscriber today Subscribe Now Information About Us Contact Advertise Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Copyright 2026. BUSINESS INSURANCE HOLDINGS Member, Beacon International Group, Ltd.
Metadata (JSON)
{
"score": 13.65
}