Sole proprietors not required to notify insurer as employers: Pa. court - Business Insurance

Article ID: 567709d30cec823b92e275c1d908825e2e0538f696b8f50b981a00c5616eb49b

Source ID: secondary:businessinsurance.com

Published At: -

Extraction Method: bs4_heuristic

URL: https://www.businessinsurance.com/sole-proprietors-not-required-to-notify-insurer-as-employers-pa-court/

Body Text

Sole proprietors not required to notify insurer as employers: Pa. court - Business Insurance Skip to content Register for free Search Search Log In Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Risk Management Cyber Risks Pricing Trends Mergers & Acquisitions Technology Sponsored Content WSIA RISKWORLD Workers Comp & Safety Workers Comp Cost Control Pain Management Workplace Safety International EMEA Asia-Pacific Latin America People Events BI Intelligence Top 100 Agents & Brokers Best Places to Work 2025 Lists Directories Insurance Pricing BI Stock Index Magazine Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe Women to Watch ALL INsurance Resources Risk Perspectives Sponsored Content Webinars White Papers Sole proprietors not required to notify insurer as employers: Pa. court by Louise Esola Workers Comp Coverage , Workplace Safety Mar 26, 2026 The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that a sole proprietor who is injured on the job is not required to notify a workers compensation insurer within 120 days to preserve eligibility for benefits, reversing a lower court decision. In Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Co. v. Heater , the court held that state law requires notice only to an employer — not to an insurer — even when the injured worker is also the business owner. The case involved David Heater, a sole proprietor who suffered a serious neck injury in a 2015 fall while performing roofing work. His insurer, Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Co., denied the claim in part on the basis that it did not receive notice of the injury until more than a year later. A workers compensation judge agreed, finding the claim barred for failure to provide timely notice. The Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board reversed, but the Commonwealth Court reinstated the denial, concluding that a sole proprietor must notify the insurer within 120 days. The state high court disagreed, finding the statute unambiguous. The ruling said the law’s definition of “employer” does not include insurers for purposes of the notice provision and applies broadly across the act. As a result, the court said, the lower court erred in reading an insurer-notification requirement into the statute. The ruling also rejected arguments that requiring notice to insurers is necessary to prevent stale claims, acknowledging those concerns but stating they cannot override the statute’s plain language. Related News Axa XL offers pollution, general liability package policy March 26, 2026 Aon Affinity unit, CNA offering midwives malpractice cover March 26, 2026 Marsh creates service delivery practice, names head March 26, 2026 Aviva plans to launch surplus lines business in Q2 March 26, 2026 D&O policy doesn’t cover antitrust suit over drug acquisition: Court March 26, 2026 Counterpart to expand offerings with professional liability hires March 26, 2026 LIRG providing $15M of quota-share reinsurance to MGA March 26, 2026 Super Micro sued by shareholders over China-related criminal case March 26, 2026 South Korean insurers likely to pay $1.1B in Iran war-related payouts March 26, 2026 Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in Business Insurance is a singular, authoritative news and information source for executives focused upon risk management, risk transfer and risk financing. Never miss important news: Become a Business Insurance Online subscriber today Subscribe Now Information About Us Contact Advertise Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Copyright 2026. BUSINESS INSURANCE HOLDINGS Member, Beacon International Group, Ltd.

Metadata (JSON)

{
  "score": 12.4
}